İnternetsiz çalışan bir mobil kontrol listesi uygulamasını nasıl tasarlayıp test edeceğinizi öğrenin: yerel depolama, senkronizasyon, çakışma çözümü, güvenlik ve yayın ipuçları.
Before you choose databases or sync tactics, get specific about who will rely on offline checklists—and what “offline” really means for them. An app used by a home organizer has very different expectations than one used by inspectors in basements, factories, or rural sites.
Start by naming the primary users and their environments:
For each group, note device constraints (shared devices vs. personal), typical session length, and how often they return online.
Write down the core actions users must complete without thinking about connectivity:
Also list “nice-to-have” actions that can wait (e.g., searching global history, exporting reports).
Be explicit about what must work fully offline (creating a new checklist run, saving progress instantly, attaching photos) versus what can be delayed (uploading media, syncing to teammates, admin edits).
If you operate under compliance rules, define requirements early: trusted timestamps, user identity, an immutable activity log, and rules about edits after submission. These decisions affect your data model and how you design sync later.
An offline checklist app succeeds or fails based on one early decision: offline-first or online-first with offline fallback.
Offline-first means the app treats the phone as the primary place where work happens. The network is a nice-to-have: syncing is a background task, not a requirement to use the app.
Online-first with offline fallback means the server is the source of truth most of the time, and the app only “limps along” offline (often read-only, or with limited edits).
For checklists used on job sites, warehouses, flights, and basements, offline-first is usually the better fit because it avoids awkward “Sorry, try again later” moments when a worker needs to tick a box right now.
Be explicit about read/write rules. A practical offline-first baseline:
When you restrict something offline (for example, inviting new team members), say so in the UI and explain why.
Offline-first still needs a promise: your work will sync when connectivity returns. Decide and communicate:
Single-user checklists are simpler: conflicts are rare and can often be resolved automatically.
Teams and shared lists require stricter rules: two people can edit the same item offline.
Choose upfront whether you’ll support true real-time collaboration later, and design now for multi-device sync, audit history, and clear “last updated by” cues to reduce surprises.
A good offline checklist app is mostly a data problem. If your model is clean and predictable, offline edits, retries, and sync become much easier.
Start by splitting the checklist someone fills out from the checklist someone authors.
This lets you update templates without breaking historical submissions.
Treat each question/task as an item with a stable ID. Store user input in answers linked to a run + item.
Practical fields to include:
id: stable UUID (generated client-side so it exists offline)template_version: to know which template definition the run was started fromupdated_at: last modified timestamp (per record)version (or revision): an integer you bump on every local changeThese “who changed what, when” hints are the foundation for your sync logic later.
Offline work is often interrupted. Add fields like status (draft, in_progress, submitted), started_at, and last_opened_at. For answers, allow nullable values and a lightweight “validation state” so users can save a draft even if required items aren’t done yet.
Photos and files should be referenced, not stored as blobs in your main checklist tables.
Create an attachments table with:
answer_id (or run_id) linkpending, uploading, uploaded, failed)This keeps checklist reads fast and makes retrying uploads straightforward.
Offline checklists live or die by the local store. You need something fast, searchable, and upgradeable—because your schema will change as soon as real users start asking for “just one more field.”
Design for common “list screens.” Index the fields you filter by most:
A small number of well-chosen indexes usually beats indexing everything (which slows writes and increases storage).
Version your schema from the first release. Each change should include:
priority field based on template defaults)Test migrations with real-ish data, not empty databases.
Offline databases grow quietly. Plan early for:
This keeps the app snappy even after months in the field.
A good offline checklist app doesn’t “sync screens”—it syncs user actions. The simplest way to do that is an outbox (sync) queue: every change a user makes is recorded locally first, then sent to the server later.
When a user checks an item, adds a note, or completes a checklist, write that action into a local table like outbox_events with:
event_id (UUID)type (e.g., CHECK_ITEM, ADD_NOTE)payload (the details)created_atstatus (pending, sending, sent, failed)This makes offline work instant and predictable: the UI updates from the local database, while the sync system works in the background.
Sync shouldn’t run constantly. Pick clear triggers so users get timely updates without draining battery:
Keep rules simple and visible. If the app can’t sync, show a small status indicator and keep the work usable.
Instead of sending one HTTP call per checkbox, batch multiple outbox events into a single request (e.g., 20–100 events). Batching reduces radio wakeups, improves throughput on shaky networks, and keeps sync time short.
Real networks drop requests. Your sync must assume every request might be sent twice.
Make each event idempotent by including event_id and having the server store processed IDs (or use an idempotency key). If the same event arrives again, the server returns success without applying it twice. That lets you retry aggressively with backoff, without creating duplicate checklist items or double-completing tasks.
If you want to go deeper on UX signals around syncing, connect this with the next section on offline workflows.
Offline checklists are deceptively simple until the same checklist is edited on two devices (or edited offline on one device while another edits online). If you don’t plan for conflicts up front, you’ll end up with “mysteriously missing” items, duplicated tasks, or overwritten notes—exactly the kind of reliability issue checklist apps can’t afford.
A few patterns show up repeatedly:
Pick one strategy and be explicit about where it applies:
Most apps combine these: per-field merge by default, LWW for a few fields, and user-assisted for the rest.
Conflicts aren’t something you “notice later”—you need signals built into your data:
When syncing, if the server revision has changed since the local base revision, you have a conflict to resolve.
When user input is required, keep it quick:
Planning this early keeps your sync logic, storage schema, and UX aligned—and prevents unpleasant surprises right before launch.
Offline support only feels “real” when the interface makes it obvious what’s happening. People using checklists in warehouses, hospitals, or on job sites don’t want to guess whether their work is safe.
Show a small, consistent status indicator near the top of key screens:
When the app goes offline, avoid pop-ups that block work. A lightweight banner that can be dismissed is usually enough. When it returns online, show a brief “Syncing…” state, then quietly clear it.
Every edit should feel saved immediately, even when disconnected. A good pattern is a three-stage save status:
Place this feedback close to the action: next to the checklist title, at the item row level (for critical fields), or in a small footer summary (“3 changes pending sync”). If something fails to sync, show a clear retry action—don’t make users hunt for it.
Offline work increases the cost of mistakes. Add guardrails:
Also consider a “Restore recently deleted” view for a short window.
Checklists are often completed while carrying tools or wearing gloves. Prioritize speed:
Design for the happy path: users should be able to complete a checklist quickly, with the app quietly handling offline details in the background.
Offline checklists break down if the user can’t access the context needed to complete them—task templates, equipment lists, site info, required photos, safety rules, or dropdown options. Treat these as “reference data” and cache them locally alongside the checklist itself.
Start with the minimum set required to finish work without guessing:
A good rule: if the UI would show a spinner when opening a checklist online, cache that dependency.
Not everything needs the same freshness. Define a TTL (time-to-live) per data type:
Also add event-based refresh triggers: user changes site/project, receives a new assignment, or opens a template that hasn’t been checked recently.
If a template updates while someone is mid-checklist, avoid silently changing the form. Show a clear “template updated” banner with options:
If new required fields appear, mark the checklist as “needs update before submit” rather than blocking offline completion.
Use versioning and deltas: sync only changed templates/lookup rows (by updatedAt or server change tokens). Store per-dataset sync cursors so the app can resume quickly and reduce bandwidth—especially important on cellular connections.
Offline checklists are useful because data lives on the device—even when there’s no network. That also means you’re responsible for protecting it if a phone is lost, shared, or compromised.
Decide what you’re protecting against:
This helps you choose the right security level without slowing the app down unnecessarily.
Never store access tokens in plain local storage. Use the OS-provided secure storage:
Keep the local database free of long-lived secrets. If you need an encryption key for the database, store that key in the Keychain/Keystore.
Database encryption can be a good idea for checklists that include personal data, addresses, photos, or compliance notes. The tradeoffs are usually:
If the main risk is “someone browses app files,” encryption is valuable. If your data is low sensitivity and devices already use OS-level full-disk encryption, you may skip it.
Plan what happens if a session expires while offline:
Store photos/files in app-private storage paths, not shared galleries. Tie each attachment to a signed-in user, enforce access checks in-app, and wipe cached files on logout (and optionally via a “Remove offline data” action in settings).
A sync feature that works on your office Wi‑Fi can still fail in elevators, rural areas, or when the OS throttles background work. Treat “the network” as unreliable by default, and design sync to fail safely and recover quickly.
Make every network call time-bounded. A request that hangs for 2 minutes feels like the app is frozen, and it can block other work.
Use retries for transient failures (timeouts, 502/503, temporary DNS issues), but don’t hammer the server. Apply exponential backoff (e.g., 1s, 2s, 4s, 8s…) with a little random jitter so thousands of devices don’t retry at the same time after an outage.
When the platform allows it, run sync in the background so checklists quietly upload when connectivity returns. Still provide a visible manual action like “Sync now” for reassurance and for cases where background sync is delayed.
Pair this with clear status: “Last synced 12 min ago”, “3 items pending”, and a non-alarming banner when offline.
Offline apps often retry the same action multiple times. Assign a unique request ID to each queued change (your event_id) and send it with the request. On the server, store processed IDs and ignore duplicates. This keeps users from accidentally creating two inspections, two signatures, or double-checking an item.
Store sync errors with context: which checklist, which step, and what the user can do next. Prefer messages like “Couldn’t upload 2 photos—connection too slow. Keep the app open and tap Sync now.” over “Sync failed.” Include a lightweight “Copy details” option for support.
Offline features usually fail at the edges: a tunnel, a weak signal, a half-finished save, or a huge checklist that takes just long enough to be interrupted. A focused test plan catches those issues before your users do.
Test airplane mode end-to-end on physical devices, not only simulators. Then go further: change connectivity mid-action.
Try scenarios like:
You’re validating that writes are durable locally, UI states remain consistent, and the app doesn’t “forget” pending changes.
Your sync queue is a piece of business logic, so treat it like one. Add automated tests that cover:
A small set of deterministic tests here prevents the most expensive class of bugs: silent data corruption.
Create large, realistic datasets: long checklists, many completed items, and attachments. Measure:
Also test worst-case devices (low-end Android, older iPhones) where slower I/O exposes bottlenecks.
Add analytics to track sync success rate and time-to-sync (from local change to confirmed server state). Watch for spikes after releases and segment by network type. This turns “sync feels flaky” into clear, actionable numbers.
Shipping an offline checklist app isn’t a one-time event—it’s the start of a feedback loop. The goal is to release safely, watch real usage, and improve sync and data quality without surprising users.
Before rollout, lock down the endpoints your app relies on so client and server evolve predictably:
Keep responses consistent and explicit (what was accepted, rejected, retried) so the app can recover gracefully.
Offline issues are often invisible unless you measure them. Track:
Alert on spikes, not single errors, and log correlation IDs so support can trace a single user’s sync story.
Use feature flags to release sync changes gradually and to disable a broken path quickly. Pair this with schema migration safeguards:
Add lightweight onboarding: how to recognize offline status, what “Queued” means, and when data will sync. Publish a help article and link it from the app (see ideas in /blog/).
If you want to validate these offline patterns quickly (local store, outbox queue, and a basic Go/PostgreSQL backend), a vibe-coding platform like Koder.ai can help you stand up a working prototype from a chat-driven spec. You can iterate on the checklist UX and sync rules, export the source code when you’re ready, and keep tightening reliability based on real field feedback.
"Offline" farklı şeyler ifade edebilir: kısa kesilmelerden günlerce bağlantısız kalmaya kadar. Tanımlayın:
Kullanıcılar düşük veya sıfır kapsama alanında güvenilir şekilde liste tamamlamak zorundaysa offline-first seçin: cihaz birincil çalışma alanıdır ve senkronizasyon arka planda gerçekleşir.
Eğer işlerin çoğu çevrimiçi gerçekleşiyorsa ve çevrimdışı mod sınırlı kalabiliyorsa (çoğunlukla salt okunur veya az düzenleme), o zaman online-first with fallback düşünülebilir.
Pratik bir temel şunları içerir:
Veriyi şu şekilde ayırın:
Bu sayede şablon güncellemeleri geçmiş gönderimleri bozmaz ve denetimi kolaylaşır.
Çevrimdışı düzenlemeleri ve senkronizasyonu desteklemek için şunlar şarttır:
updated_at.Yerel bir outbox (senkronizasyon) kuyruğu kullanın; ekranı değil, kullanıcı eylemlerini kaydeder. Her olay şunları içermeli:
Her değişikliği tekrar denemeye uygun hâle getirin: her işlem için bir event_id (idempotency anahtarı) gönderin. Sunucu işlenmiş ID'leri saklar ve çift gelen olayları görmezden gelir.
Böylece ağ kopmaları veya yeniden gönderimler sırasında çift kayıt, çift onay gibi sorunlar önlenir.
Çoğu uygulama şu stratejileri kombine eder:
Çakışmaları tespit etmek için bir ve kullanıcının düzenlemeye başladığı zamanki kaydedilmelidir.
Sorgulama ve raporlama bekliyorsanız güvenilir, sorgulanabilir bir depoyu tercih edin:
Ayrıca baştan itibaren migration (şema geçiş) mekanizması ekleyin ki şema değişiklikleri kurulu uygulamaları kırmasın.
İşlem yapmadan önce tehdidi belirleyin:
Buna göre gerekli güvenlik seviyesini seçin ve uygulamayı gereksiz yere yavaşlatmayın.
Gerçek ağlarla dayanıklı senkronizasyon için şunlara dikkat edin:
Testleri sadece “internet yok” durumu yerine gerçekçi çevrimdışı akışlar olarak yapın:
Piyasaya sürmek bir başlangıçtır; izleyin ve yineleyin. Dikkat edilecekler:
Prototip için hızlı doğrulama isterseniz, Koder.ai gibi araçlarla bir MVP (yerel depo, outbox kuyruğu, temel backend ile) hızlıca kurup sahadan gelen geri bildirimlere göre iyileştirebilirsiniz.
Bir şey kısıtlıysa (ör. ekip davet etme), bunu UI’da açıklayın.
version/revision sayacı.template_version.Bu alanlar, senkronizasyon, yeniden denemeler ve çakışma tespitini tahmin edilebilir kılar.
event_id (UUID)type (ör. CHECK_ITEM, ADD_NOTE)payloadcreated_atstatus (pending, sending, sent, failed)UI, yerel veritabanından anında güncellenir; outbox arka planda senkronize eder.
Ayrıca senkronizasyon kuyruğu ve çakışma mantığı için otomatik testler yazın; yerel veritabanı performansını büyük verilerle yük testiyle ölçün.