시계열 데이터베이스가 지표와 관찰성에 중요한 이유

Q: What’s the difference between metrics, monitoring, and observability?

Metrics are the numeric measurements (latency, error rate, CPU, queue depth). Monitoring is collecting them, graphing them, and alerting when they look wrong. Observability is the ability to explain why they look wrong by combining metrics with logs (what happened) and traces (where time went across services).

Q: Why is time-series data different from “normal” application data?

Time-series data is continuous value + timestamp data, so you mostly ask range questions (last 15 minutes, before/after deploy) and rely heavily on aggregations (avg, p95, rate) rather than fetching individual rows. That makes storage layout, compression, and range-scan performance much more important than in typical transactional workloads.

Q: What is a time-series database (TSDB) in practical terms?

A TSDB is optimized for metrics workloads: high write rates , mostly append-only ingestion, and fast time-range queries with common monitoring functions (bucketing, rollups, rates, percentiles, group-by labels). It’s built to keep dashboards and alert evaluations responsive as data volume grows.

Q: Will a TSDB “fix” my observability problems automatically?

Not by itself. A TSDB improves the mechanics of storing and querying metrics, but you still need: - Instrumentation that measures the right things - Clear SLOs/SLIs and alert intent - Sensible alert thresholds and windows - A workflow to pivot to logs/traces for root cause Without those, you can still have fast dashboards that don’t help you act.

Q: What is “high cardinality” and why does it cause problems?

Cardinality is the number of unique time series produced by label combinations. It explodes when you add dimensions like instance, endpoint, status code, or (worst) unbounded IDs. High cardinality typically causes: - Memory pressure from “hot” series metadata - Large label indexes and higher disk usage - Slow queries and delayed alert evaluations It’s often the first thing that makes a metrics system unstable or expensive.

Q: Which metric labels should I keep, and which should I avoid?

Prefer labels with bounded values and stable meaning: - Good: , , , , normalized (route template) - Risky: if the fleet churns rapidly - Avoid: user/session/request/order IDs, full URLs with query strings, raw error text Put those high-detail identifiers in logs/traces and keep metric labels focused on grouping and triage.

Q: What are the first steps to adopt a TSDB for monitoring?

Validate the fit with a small, measurable rollout: 1. Start with 5–10 critical services and the golden signals (latency, errors, traffic, saturation). 2. Confirm ingestion correctness (timestamps, units, label sets). 3. Set raw retention + rollups, then build baseline dashboards. 4. Add a few user-impact alerts first. 5. Track success metrics: query latency, ingestion errors, cardinality growth, and monthly cost. A short PoC using real dashboards and alert queries is usually more valuable than feature checklists.

로그인 시작하기

자주 묻는 질문

What’s the difference between metrics, monitoring, and observability?

Metrics are the numeric measurements (latency, error rate, CPU, queue depth). Monitoring is collecting them, graphing them, and alerting when they look wrong. Observability is the ability to explain why they look wrong by combining metrics with logs (what happened) and traces (where time went across services).

Why is time-series data different from “normal” application data?

Time-series data is continuous value + timestamp data, so you mostly ask range questions (last 15 minutes, before/after deploy) and rely heavily on aggregations (avg, p95, rate) rather than fetching individual rows. That makes storage layout, compression, and range-scan performance much more important than in typical transactional workloads.

What is a time-series database (TSDB) in practical terms?

A TSDB is optimized for metrics workloads: high write rates, mostly append-only ingestion, and fast time-range queries with common monitoring functions (bucketing, rollups, rates, percentiles, group-by labels). It’s built to keep dashboards and alert evaluations responsive as data volume grows.

Will a TSDB “fix” my observability problems automatically?

Not by itself. A TSDB improves the mechanics of storing and querying metrics, but you still need:

Instrumentation that measures the right things
Clear SLOs/SLIs and alert intent
Sensible alert thresholds and windows
A workflow to pivot to logs/traces for root cause

Without those, you can still have fast dashboards that don’t help you act.

When should I use metrics vs logs vs traces?

Metrics provide fast, cheap detection and trend tracking, but they’re limited in detail. Keep:

Logs for high-cardinality, per-event context (error messages, payload facts)
Traces for request-level causality across services

Use metrics to detect and narrow scope, then pivot to logs/traces for the detailed evidence.

What is “high cardinality” and why does it cause problems?

Cardinality is the number of unique time series produced by label combinations. It explodes when you add dimensions like instance, endpoint, status code, or (worst) unbounded IDs. High cardinality typically causes:

Memory pressure from “hot” series metadata
Large label indexes and higher disk usage
Slow queries and delayed alert evaluations

It’s often the first thing that makes a metrics system unstable or expensive.

Which metric labels should I keep, and which should I avoid?

Prefer labels with bounded values and stable meaning:

Good: service, region, , , normalized (route template)

How should I think about retention and downsampling (rollups)?

Retention controls cost and query speed. A common setup is:

Raw, high-resolution metrics for short windows (e.g., 7–30 days) for incident debugging
Rolled-up/downsampled metrics for longer windows (e.g., 6–24 months) for trends

Downsampling trades precision for cheaper storage and faster long-range queries; using min/max alongside averages can preserve "something happened" signals.

Why do alerts depend so much on TSDB query performance and timing?

Most alert rules are range-based and aggregation-heavy (thresholds, rates/ratios, anomaly comparisons). If queries are slow or ingestion is late, you get flapping, missed incidents, or delayed pages. Practical steps:

Use windows aligned to your scrape/emit interval
Prefer rates/ratios over raw counts when traffic varies
Define “no data” behavior explicitly
Link each alert to a dashboard and a short runbook (e.g., /runbooks/service-5xx)

What are the first steps to adopt a TSDB for monitoring?

Validate the fit with a small, measurable rollout:

Start with 5–10 critical services and the golden signals (latency, errors, traffic, saturation).
Confirm ingestion correctness (timestamps, units, label sets).
Set raw retention + rollups, then build baseline dashboards.
Add a few user-impact alerts first.
Track success metrics: query latency, ingestion errors, cardinality growth, and monthly cost.

A short PoC using real dashboards and alert queries is usually more valuable than feature checklists.

지표, 모니터링, 관찰성: 기본 개념

시간 기반 데이터가 다른 이유

TSDB가 해결하는 문제(그리고 해결하지 못하는 것)

빠른 예시: 시간에 따른 지연

시계열 데이터가 독특한 이유

지속적인 흐름을 위한 쓰기 패턴

조회는 거의 항상 “범위” 기반

신호는 선의 형태에 있다

시계열 데이터베이스(TSDB)란 무엇인가

시간에 맞춘 스토리지 설계

숫자 시계열을 위한 압축과 인코딩

앱엔드-온리 쓰기가 빠른 이유

일반적인 API와 쿼리 스타일

왜 TSDB가 모니터링 워크로드에 적합한가

시간 기반 질문에 대한 빠른 응답

팀의 사고방식에 맞는 집계

시간 버켓팅, 롤업, 예측 가능한 비용

지속적인 수집 하에서의 성능

고카디널리티: 지표의 성패를 좌우하는 요소

카디널리티가 의미하는 것(그리고 왜 폭발하는가)

카디널리티가 너무 높을 때 무엇이 먼저 망가지는가

라벨 선택: 무엇을 남기고 무엇을 피할 것인가

보존 정책(리텐션), 다운샘플링, 비용 통제

압축이 중요한 이유

보존: 원시 vs 집계 데이터

다운샘플링/롤업: 언제 적용할까

절충(정밀도, 저장, 속도)

알림은 신뢰할 수 있고 시기적절한 쿼리를 필요로 함

알림 쿼리는 어떻게 생겼나

평가 창(Windows): 타이밍이 중요한 이유

흔한 함정(그리고 줄이는 방법)

알림을 실행 가능하게 만들기

TSDB가 관찰성 스택에서 차지하는 위치

지표: 빠른 탐지와 SLO 추적

로그와 트레이스: 문제가 감지된 후의 문맥

간단한 워크플로: 감지 → 분류 → 심층 조사

확장성과 신뢰성 고려사항

수평 확장: 샤딩과 복제

수집 급증 처리: 버퍼링과 역압(backpressure)

멀티테넌시 현실: 팀과 환경

메트릭 데이터의 보안 및 거버넌스

안전한 수집: 전송 경로 보호

접근 제어: 누가 어떤 메트릭을 읽을 수 있는가

데이터 최소화: 민감 정보는 라벨에 두지 마라

규제 환경을 위한 감 auditability

팀에 맞는 TSDB 선택 방법

몇 가지 구체적인 질문부터 시작하세요

매니지드 vs 셀프 호스팅: 운영상의 절충

통합을 무시하지 마라

PoC를 실행하고 성공 지표를 정하라

TSDB로 모니터링을 개선하기 위한 실용적 다음 단계

짧은 시작 체크리스트

메트릭 규약 문서화(효과가 빠릅니다)

권장 다음 단계

자주 묻는 질문